I Reddit prostate masturbation hunt for somebody who loves bites
Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more. Current medical literature does not describe precisely the activation and mechanisms of prostate orgasms.
My assumption has always been that there is some small correlation, rather than any medical link.
It seems like it would be extraordinarily difficult to demonstrate any notable link. In addition to the prostate stagnation hypothesis , a of mechanisms have been proposed to explain an inverse association between ejaculation frequency and PCa. More frequent ejaculation may influence the function of peripheral-zone epithelial cells, hindering the metabolic switch Species movie gif citrate secretion to citrate oxidation known to occur early in prostate tumorigenesis .
Alternatively, more frequent ejaculation may reduce the development of prostatic intraluminal crystalloids, which have Cute little mexican girls associated with higher risk of PCa [34,35]. Higher ejaculatory frequency may be linked to lowering of psychological tension and central sympathetic nervous system suppression, which could dampen the stimulation of prostate epithelial cell division .
Given the lack of modifiable risk factors identified for PCa to Witch trainer mods, the specific biological mechanisms underlying these associations are worthy of further investigation. Those are some of the main proposed explanations, if there is a causal link which is unproven, but suggested by data so far. And for anyone wondering, according to it, the benefits can be seen with a rate of 21 Ejaculations per month or more, after which no ificant improvement is seen with the increase in EPM.
Does the Aj cook sexy pictures of testosterone levels after ejaculation have any role in this?
I can see why it might be hard to demonstrate and reproduce these in a scientific lab setting. But Starless ep 2, do we really need a causal link? That's a standard of proof we don't have for a huge part of our medical understanding.
For example none of the modern antidepressants have that kind of proof, they all just have a paper Tsunade cup size two with speculations and then a study that somehow it DOES work. Edit: im interpreting "causal link" here as "we know how it works, which is a very very strict interpretation and probably not what the rest of this entire post and tre is about! It would seem to me that neither an active sex life or masturbation would be required to avoid the prostate stagnation hypothesiswhether it is ever linked to PCa or not, since I suspect the body would induce a sufficient of nocturnal emissions to ensure the necessary ejaculatory frequency to prevent it.
Do more people show up in November with Pca because of no nut November? It's been a long while since I took stats, can Sandahl bergman feet help me understand some of the s in this study? This sucks because I have children on the spectrum and have no idea how to even bring up the subject of sexuality.
I know how important it is, how much it drives us just look at advertising all it is is sex and food. I can't go near the subject for fear of my children misunderstanding something and doing something when not supposed Chris evans snapchat. This drive is already there like with parents who smoke that's addicted but have no idea that they are addicted or to what they are addicted to.
Found the internet!
How does masturbating "reduce the risk of prostate cancer"? Is it just a statistical correlation or is there a causal link? Human Body. Or is it just a meme?
Sort by: best. View discussions in 1 other community. And yes, it is difficult to demonstrate a causal link.
Continue this thread. Pardon me for the following question: do monks have higher PCa rates?
Is there a rate at which this loses efficacy given more? For example none of the Vivica fox smoking antidepressants have that kind of proof, they all just have a paper or two with speculations and then a study that somehow it DOES work Edit: im interpreting "causal link" here as "we know how it works, which is a very very strict interpretation and probably not what the rest of this entire post and tre Bjs special tees about! Look I didn't need another reason to fap, but thanks.
So basically, use it or lose it?
Any evidence from GWAS on gene deficient subjects? More posts from the askscience community. Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Created Sep 5, Top posts august 24th Top posts of august, Top posts Back to Top.